4 ms·
I used to keep it in SQLite (much easier to distribute than PostgreSQL). It worked a lot better than many other options I tried. However, rebuilding the databas
by rspeer 9y ago
I used to keep it in SQLite (much easier to distribute than PostgreSQL). It worked a lot better than many other options I tried. However, rebuilding the database from updated data would take more than a day, and some queries were too slow.
Switching to PostgreSQL sped things up, at the cost of requiring a separate database process, dealing with psql's weird access control, and adding an inconvenient step of loading the data using COPY commands.
- justinclift 9y agoHmmm, sounds like the data itself would be feasible then. SQLite could be considered just a data transport container for this purpose. :)