6 ms·
The title itself uses a basic framing technique intentionally written to fool you into a false conclusion. 1- "worse than slaughterhouses and sawmills" is more
by AKifer 9y ago
The title itself uses a basic framing technique intentionally written to fool you into a false conclusion.
1- "worse than slaughterhouses and sawmills" is more catchy than "better than X" (chose any X automaker)
2- Is the safety level of a slaughterhouses or a sawmill comparable to a car's ? They are things not in the same category, with different sophistication level and different purpose, how many times a day an average person will enter a slaughterhouse or a sawmill ?
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- quickben 9y agoOf course they aren't. Working on a slaughter house requires gear, starting from chainmail gloves so you don't lose fingers and on. Have you ever entered a sawmill? Don't get me started. So, if Tesla is a higher injury place than a sawmill, somebody shoduld send inspections and audit the place thoroughly.
- anotheryou 9y agoFurthermore, if Tesla indeed is very advanced in automation: how does this affect the kind of jobs done by humans? It would make more sense to compare to the most simmilar companies.