4 ms·
Can you please explain this in more detail? Ideally with an example request that you see? (I highly doubt that there is any truth to this claim)
by st3fan 9y ago
Can you please explain this in more detail? Ideally with an example request that you see?
(I highly doubt that there is any truth to this claim)
- helb 9y agoI think they were referring to https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Safe_Browsing https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Safe_Browsing … which uses safebrowsing.google.com, but doesn't send any "DOM hashes" to them.
- themihai 9y agoHow do you explain this? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5971403 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5971403
- themihai 9y agoI think you can check the source https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/chrome/browser/safe_browsing/client_side_model_loader.h https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/chrome/browser/safe_bro... Long story short it sends the DOM "model" including links, input names etc. There was a story on HN about this https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5971403 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5971403
- st3fan 9y agoYou should read the Privacy section at https://feeding.cloud.geek.nz/posts/how-safe-browsing-works-in-firefox/ https://feeding.cloud.geek.nz/posts/how-safe-browsing-works-... > One of the most persistent misunderstandings about Safe Browsing is the idea that the browser needs to send all visited URLs to Google in order to verify whether or not they are safe. > While this was an option in version 1 of the Safe Browsing protocol (as disclosed in their privacy policy at the time), support for this "enhanced mode" was removed in Firefox 3 and the version 1 server was decommissioned in late 2011 in favor of version 2 of the Safe Browsing API which doesn't offer this type of real-time lookup. Firefox 3 - That was 9 years ago.
- themihai 9y agoI believe that doesn't take into account the client side detection. It was added later.