4 ms·
> Because you're gambling the entire IPFS project on it. One of the reasons I like the IPFS project so much is that they produce a lot of good side products (m
by hobofan 9y ago
> Because you're gambling the entire IPFS project on it.
One of the reasons I like the IPFS project so much is that they produce a lot of good side products (multiformats, libp2p) that can help anyone build an IPFS-like system.
So I wouldn't see it that bleak. Even if that choice of NURIs is a fatal flaw as you claim, it is still a very surface-level problem that could be fixed in a fork of it.