4 ms·
> Why is it better for the people to have dozens of currencies that they can only use for a very limited selection of stores and have to trade for other uses?
by splintercell 9y ago
> Why is it better for the people to have dozens of currencies that they can only use for a very limited selection of stores and have to trade for other uses?
It isn't necessarily better to have dozens of different currencies, but it is better to have the ability to issue your own currencies rather than be dependent upon a single monopoly which may (and does) abuse its power.
Second thing is, there is no real way to determine how many currencies/tokens are consumers ok with, other than to really try it out in the market. Let me use an example.
Today if you have Amazon prime TV, then they have a whole section subscriptions for channels where you can subscribe to Prime, Netflix, Hulu, Crackle, CBS, Showtime, Scifi, History Channel etc, services. Initially it started out with just Prime, Netflix, and Hulu, but now there are so many options, you can't just watch Homeland if you have these three subscriptions. The problem isn't just that you need to pay more, but rather that you have to subscribe to so many services.
This is too confusing, but this also means that this is a problem to be solved. In future (and I think some company has already started) to build a package subscription. Maybe another solution would be to have every show a pay-per-view basis (which Amazon already does).
The idea is, that the reason why different subscription services exists because of some other, unavoidable business reason. But this can be solved from the user experience point of view differently without resorting to a govt monopoly on entertainment.
Same thing goes with these cryptocurrencies. They exist for different, unavoidable business reason, but it is also annoying to have to deal with different currencies, so I believe in future there will be more basket of currencies solution (like ICONOMI) which allows people to hold 2-3 cryptos at max, and from their POV, the conversion and payment to the native currency happens seamlessly.
- sharemywin 9y agoThe problem is volatility. If the amount of people that are speculating >>>> than people willing to sell other things to buy "your coin" in a bad market. You could collapse the currency.
- splintercell 9y agoBut that's the whole point. We have solved this problem for over 2000 years now using financial derivatives. A farmer in ancient Rome did not want to undertake the volatility of grain prices when his crop eventually comes to the market, so what he did is sells his future crop to a fixed current price to someone who wants to undertake the risk of price fluctuations, and this way a speculator got the profit which came out of correctly predicting the future grain prices and farmer got a fixed predictable price. Same goes with these currencies. A speculator might provide enough liquidity to your crypto, in return he gets a better deal for your coins.
- benjaminmbrown 9y agoVolatility is not as important when you have real-time exchanges. You can choose to instantly convert any currency to any other currency of your choice - you can choose your volatility tolerance . In the past, that was an ardous, fee-laden process. Now it is becoming more free & seamless due digital tokens. ERC20 should continue making it easier.