4 ms·
I get that they're hand-picked examples, but it's still a bit misleading when every "older" engineer in the article is quite a remarkable individual with incred
by kevinmannix 9y ago
I get that they're hand-picked examples, but it's still a bit misleading when every "older" engineer in the article is quite a remarkable individual with incredible resumes. They'd likely be warmly welcomed at any tech company.
I'm more curious about the average age across the engineering organization, and specifically older engineers who are solid, good workers but aren't creators of popular languages or pioneered tech migrations for large company.
- pm90 9y agoMy experience is that age isn't necessarily a breaking factor in all but the most frivolous tech companies, but those are the ones you shouldn't care about anyways. The key skill/ability is mostly having the capacity and willingness to understand and accept new paradigms and techniques instead of being enamored to and clinging to "that's how its done" philosophy. Of course, I'm not suggesting dropping good practices just because they are old; simply having the willingness to do an objective analysis and comparison and make a rational decision... that is really important. And almost every older engineer I've worked with have shown precisely these qualities (maybe a survivorship bias?)
- monkchips 9y agoi don't know how to get that data, but i'd love to see it