Duh, yes, of course What a weirdly trite response given that you're essentially repeating what I said. And without specifics the linked piece, and its claims a

Duh, yes, of course What a weirdly trite response given that you're essentially repeating what I said. And without specifics the linked piece, and its claims about benchmarks, is utterly meaningless. "Rewrote inefficient code. Now it's faster. Story at 11!" The AgeOfAscent story is not a PR piece Humorously it was likely a "copy a L1 cached static response" type benchmark. Okay, so it wasn't PR, it was self-aggrandizement (which is effectively PR). Got it. Though in this article it was linked as a performance improvement of "switching" to .NET Core, when really it was a story of terribly inefficient .NET Core code becoming better, though again in a nutshell it is meaningless. Cool.