4 ms·
+1 That thing is gross. I'd edit so much more slowly if I had to go back to a messy, complex syntax. At least without a very clever / specialized editor effec
by camdez 9y ago
+1 That thing is gross. I'd edit so much more slowly if I had to go back to a messy, complex syntax. At least without a very clever / specialized editor effectively undoing the change for me.
Infix is occasionally more readable for math, but I'd rather have a macro to transform a delimited section of infix code than to mess with the language.
- yjgyhj 9y agoInfix is only easy to read if you're only used to it. Not inherently better - I'd say opposite even. Also, I don't want to live without Paredit (or Smartparens)