2 ms·
Look at them. 6c does not apply. No such offer was made, nor were the preconditions met. 6d is the only option that applies, and while those copies had the st
by raggi 9y ago
Look at them.
6c does not apply. No such offer was made, nor were the preconditions met.
6d is the only option that applies, and while those copies had the standard links to upstream, they had no links to downstream.
See https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AnonFTPAndSendSources https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AnonFTPAndSendSour... and what follows it if you're not willing to read the license.
- quadrangle 9y agoI'm sorry, you're right. I should have been more clear. The violation comes if there is not a notice to visitors that the software is AGPL and instructing them how to get the source. I didn't check the links in question, but I had the impression it could be okay enough for an instance to just link back to the original Media Goblin project where source is if they haven't modified anything. IANAL Also, I don't seem to be able to edit my problematic reply above (which is correct in some regards, not so much in others). But thanks for clarifying here. I regret spreading some misunderstandings.