It is interesting that the hockey stick can be both a lie, fraud, and never exist. The satiric brilliance of many of your 'arguments' is that they aren't even

It is interesting that the hockey stick can be both a lie, fraud, and never exist. The satiric brilliance of many of your 'arguments' is that they aren't even logically valid. Suppose the temp in 2006 was the same as 1000 years ago (it wasn't but suppose), it doesn't even remotely follow that man-made CO2 emissions don't cause the Earth to get warmer. It is a comically absurd leap of basic logic to get to that conclusion.