4 ms·

Not sure if you are trying to be sarcastic, but: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Nuclear_Event_Scale#Level_7:_Major_accident https://en.wikipedia.or

• csours 9y ago
  Fukushima and Chernobyl are both classed as 7s, but the amount of radiation released at Fukushima was at least an order of magnitude less than Chernobyl, with 80% of that falling on the ocean. Fukushima caused half as many people as Chernobyl to evacuate. No one died as a direct result of Fukushima, as opposed to 2 immediate + 28 cleanup deaths from Chernobyl. Fukushima definitely deserves to be taken seriously, and it belongs in the same class as Chernobyl, but at the other end of that class.
  • adrianratnapala 9y ago
    Another difference is that Fukushima was just one result (and by far not the worst result) of a huge natural disaster.
• xrange 9y ago
  If Fukushima is a major event, with no fatalities, what does one consider the Banqiao Dam event, with 170,000 fatalities? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banqiao_Dam https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banqiao_Dam
  • mistermann 9y ago
    "That's different!"
  • adrianN 9y ago
    Also a major event, but in a category that is almost completely irrelevant to the current discussion.
  • vkou 9y ago
    A sign that we should shut down every single hydroelectric power-plant in the world. Or, we could be reasonable about these things, and understand that power generation at an industrial scale will kill people.