4 ms·

I am not sure, but it's floating around. https://www.google.com/search?q=%E6%9F%AF%E6%B4%81%E5%92%8CAlphaGo&oq=%E6%9F%AF%E6%B4%81%E5%92%8CAlphaGo&aqs=chrome..6

I am not sure, but it's floating around. https://www.google.com/search?q=%E6%9F%AF%E6%B4%81%E5%92%8CAlphaGo&oq=%E6%9F%AF%E6%B4%81%E5%92%8CAlphaGo&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60.143j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 https://www.google.com/search?q=%E6%9F%AF%E6%B4%81%E5%92%8CA... Sites like Sina and Sogou are able to report, and those aren't small sites. They got millions of views every day. That site you quoted is anti-PRC news site. Not trying to discredit, but it isn't a total ban. At least the result isn't and probably won't.

CydeWeys 9y ago
> Not trying to discredit, but it isn't a total ban. At least the result isn't and probably won't. That's the lowest bar in the world. It's a damn board game. The stream was six hours of two men sitting across a table from each other placing black and white stones. Optionally, some of the streams had commentators talking about how good the moves were as they were played. That such a thing could be subjected to censorship is absurd. As for the result not being censored, well, it's literally a single bit of information. That was only censored because it's not practical to do so.
Macuyiko 9y ago
Agreed, that's why I mentioned "apparently", though it is what the NYTimes is referring to (although I guess they also have a bone to pick with the PRC).