You might be right about technical and financial IBM performance, but this article is about remote working: 1) Bias in favor of IBM strengthens the "friendly"

You might be right about technical and financial IBM performance, but this article is about remote working: 1) Bias in favor of IBM strengthens the "friendly" criticism in the article. 2) IBM is (was) actually committed, since the '90s, to providing collaboration tools that facilitate remote working and distributed teams. Do you remember Lotus Notes?