4 ms·
why?
by gadnium79 9y ago
why?
- detaro 9y agoThat's answered in the README.
- adrianpike 9y ago...why not?
- analognoise 9y agoI've always thought why is more important than why not. Example: "I'm going to hit myself in the dick with a hammer."
- int_19h 9y agoYour example has an obvious great answer to "why not?", though, so no harm done in asking that question first.
- bitwize 9y agoWell, why don't you MARRY safe science if you love it so much!! :)
- mirimir 9y agoActually, that's not so problematic unless there's an anvil involved, or the hammer is moving quickly.
- sqeaky 9y agoI still don't think its a problem. I can swing the hammer if AnalogNoise cannot build up sufficient speed.
- alnitak 9y agoWhile I agree the grandparent's comment doesn't add much to the conversation, and even has many obvious answers, why is a more interesting question. You are basically questioning if there is a need to change the status quo, or put in physics terms, why do you want to expend energy to move from the local stable point? What is the point with higher stability you want to reach, and what are the characteristics that make this point desirable and justify the energy expenditure?