6 ms·
>Why won't wikileaks confirm or deny whether he worked for them? Because they have a lot to gain politically by hinting at it and adding fuel to the conspiracy
by sanswork 9y ago
>Why won't wikileaks confirm or deny whether he worked for them?
Because they have a lot to gain politically by hinting at it and adding fuel to the conspiracy theories while being able to say "we didn't actually say he was our source" if the actual data comes out proving he wasn't.
>It's like they want to fuel conspiracy theories without feeling responsible for them.
They do and your vouching this above comment is just helping these people smear a dead mans life.
- Houshalter 9y agoAlright I undid it, mostly because I don't want to get in trouble with the mods. That does make a lot of sense. I have a friend who is really into this stuff and showed me videos about it. So I reacted negatively when the only discussion about it was flagged to hell, and all the comments were just telling him to "fuck off" with no argument.
- micheljones 9y agoThank you for the support of free speech anyway. I do not claim it is true, I claim that there's enough 'hints' that it should warrant a proper investigation and not a coverup. As for this guy's claims: 1) Assange all but confirms it: https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/866536275972689920 https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/866536275972689920 2) Seth Rich's parents want the truth and justice as well, instead of the coverup that was done so far: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcKiYTq5Gho https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcKiYTq5Gho
- micheljones 9y agoAssange all but confirms it on his account: https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/866536275972689920 https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/866536275972689920 As for the 'smearing a dead man's life', I don't see how it's smearing - if it gets proven to be true, that man is a national hero. And as for 'causing hardship to his family', which is probably the next angle you're gonna try to use, the dead man's parents want the truth too, and not a coverup of their son's death: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcKiYTq5Gho https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcKiYTq5Gho
- sanswork 9y agoAssange is very careful to give the impression of confirming it while never actually doing it because he wants to fuel the fires. >I don't see how it's smearing You're saying he isn't trustworthy and that he is a criminal. >he dead man's parents want the truth too, and not a coverup of their son's death: That video was thanking people for supporting the gofundme campaign and has nothing to do with the conspiracy theories. This fact has been posted everywhere the video has for days now so given your obvious interest I can only assume that you're posting it knowing this. His family have threatened to sue fox and his brother wrote quite the letter to Hannity asking him to stop.
- micheljones 9y agoI am saying that he's a hero. As for the threats to sue, they were issued by a DNC spokeperson, and not by the family: https://i.redd.it/2p4wvr9k9wxy.png https://i.redd.it/2p4wvr9k9wxy.png
- sanswork 9y agoYou believe the leaker is a hero. But what you are saying is that he hacked into his employers email accounts and stole their emails then distributed that information to a third party. It's nice to see the DNC supporting his family. Search for his brothers letter.
- micheljones 9y agohttp://archive.is/ZD6Sf#selection-1347.12-1347.140 http://archive.is/ZD6Sf#selection-1347.12-1347.140
- sanswork 9y agoWheeler: "I have no evidence but I'm pretty sure the police are hiding something!" Foxnews corespondent: The family is begging me for help. The family: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/were-seth-richs-parents-stop-politicizing-our-sons-murder/2017/05/23/164cf4dc-3fee-11e7-9869-bac8b446820a_story.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/were-seth-richs-pare...