You might be right that the person was not innocent. No, you do not give the accuser (and in this case, the company firing someone from their job) the 'benefit

You might be right that the person was not innocent. No, you do not give the accuser (and in this case, the company firing someone from their job) the 'benefit of the doubt' in my world. Either it's a clear cut case (fine) or it's not (if you fire someone in this case, you're an asshole working for a shitty company). Now, I'm not saying that Google DID this. But the defendant should have the benefit of the doubt.