3 ms·
who said the person was innocent? I would give google benefit of doubt that it's in their utmost interest to identify the actual leaker and not just make an exa
by jordache 9y ago
who said the person was innocent? I would give google benefit of doubt that it's in their utmost interest to identify the actual leaker and not just make an example of anyone
- darklajid 9y agoYou might be right that the person was not innocent. No, you do not give the accuser (and in this case, the company firing someone from their job) the 'benefit of the doubt' in my world. Either it's a clear cut case (fine) or it's not (if you fire someone in this case, you're an asshole working for a shitty company). Now, I'm not saying that Google DID this. But the defendant should have the benefit of the doubt.
- jordache 9y agogoogle dismissed the person. I'm giving google benefit of doubt to dismiss the actual leaker. Why would google dismiss a random individual who may be innocent? It doesn't provide them with the resolution they seek