While I agree with the result of your statement the justification seems quite weak. You can't own human beings, because it violates their fundamental rights.

While I agree with the result of your statement the justification seems quite weak. You can't own human beings, because it violates their fundamental rights. Where do those fundamental rights come from? I also wanted to attack a couple more of your statements but I have no formal education in philosophy or law and I would probably mess up the [subtle] differences between moral, legal, lawful, and so on. But I am nonetheless pretty sure that many of your points are at least not entirely true or need additional backing by certain philosophy frameworks.