4 ms·
> The abstract on the Nature article focuses on the 15 new SNPs found that affect intelligence, in addition to the 336 already known It's a little ambiguous, b
by jlebar 9y ago
> The abstract on the Nature article focuses on the 15 new SNPs found that affect intelligence, in addition to the 336 already known
It's a little ambiguous, but that's not how I read the abstract. The relevant sentence:
> We identify 336 associated SNPs in 18 genomic loci, of which 15 are new.
That seems to be saying that 15 of the 18 genomic loci are new, not that 15 of the 336 SNPs are new. Given that they "identified" 336 SNPs, presumably they all are new?
- sbierwagen 9y agoI would prefer to read the actual text of the paper, rather than play abstract exegesis. Does anybody have a link to a pdf?
- subroutine 9y agoCan you get past this paywall?: https://www.nature.com/ng/journal/vaop/ncurrent/pdf/ng.3869.pdf https://www.nature.com/ng/journal/vaop/ncurrent/pdf/ng.3869....
- gwern 9y agohttps://www.dropbox.com/s/4ahzugblv4s2474/2017-sniekers.pdf https://www.dropbox.com/s/4ahzugblv4s2474/2017-sniekers.pdf