> Ironic that the "hub for open-source projects" could become a walled garden if the latter happens. I would say that the irony occurred when the "hub for open

> Ironic that the "hub for open-source projects" could become a walled garden if the latter happens. I would say that the irony occurred when the "hub for open-source projects" is a closed-source platform. (And I would say that as a paying user of Github that rather loves it.)