3 ms·
Not Simulink diagram, ASCET (https://www.etas.com/en/products/ascet_software_products.php https://www.etas.com/en/products/ascet_software_products.php) diagram.
by _0ffh 9y ago
Not Simulink diagram, ASCET (https://www.etas.com/en/products/ascet_software_products.php https://www.etas.com/en/products/ascet_software_products.php) diagram.
Also, it seems to me that the functions in question that enabled cheating can be seen as "dual use". The customer could have given some innocuous reason for their need for these customer specific functions, but then used them for cheating.
If I remember the CCC talks correctly, it was quite the nontrivial/involved feat for VW to configure the software in such a way that the cycle detection signal influences ad blue injection rates, although the EDC architecture is quite data-driven.
- rurban 9y agoAgree with the plausible deniability. They obviously came up with some innocent names and only told co-conspirators the real meaning behind. Interesting: https://www.etas.com/en/products/ascet_developer.php https://www.etas.com/en/products/ascet_developer.php Generates C via models. I prefer SimuLink RealTime-Workshop (now Simulink Coder) though. You only need very few C there.