4 ms·
That's an oversight on Github's part and will end in a TOS change in one of two directions: price parity or complete prohibition of paid services that use GH in
by TAForObvReasons 9y ago
That's an oversight on Github's part and will end in a TOS change in one of two directions: price parity or complete prohibition of paid services that use GH integrations outside of the marketplace
- abustamam 9y agoIronic that the "hub for open-source projects" could become a walled garden if the latter happens.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- stephenr 9y agoIrony is about intentions. Free-for-open is a marketing tactic, pure and simple.
- robzyb 9y ago> Ironic that the "hub for open-source projects" could become a walled garden if the latter happens. I would say that the irony occurred when the "hub for open-source projects" is a closed-source platform. (And I would say that as a paying user of Github that rather loves it.)