3 ms·
As long as there are users, it will be necessary (or desirable, at the very very least) to design experiences for them. The assumption you make is that "talkin
by virgil_disgr4ce 9y ago
As long as there are users, it will be necessary (or desirable, at the very very least) to design experiences for them. The assumption you make is that "talking to a humanlike intelligence is so natural as to be trivial." But salespeople, for instance, still need to be trained in how best to talk to their customers, what to say, what not to say, etc..
- ThomPete 9y agoTo the extent that salespeople are relevant and using ML nothing UX wise has changed. Same rules still apply. My assumption is that many of the benefits of ML can't be used by humans but have to be used by other machines to create a final "useful to human" output.