6 ms·
Maybe it is? Idk, I'm no ethicist so I wouldn't be able to justify it. But is it any different than using the web link to get a google redirect when you didn't
by frgtpsswrdlame 9y ago
Maybe it is? Idk, I'm no ethicist so I wouldn't be able to justify it. But is it any different than using the web link to get a google redirect when you didn't really come from google? Or using incognito mode? Perhaps the better discussion is about how a community forum handles articles which only a subset of people can access.
- avemg 9y agoIt's one thing to find a loophole in their paywall to view their content on their site. It seems to me that it's quite another to scrape their content and serve it up somewhere else in its entirety.
- frgtpsswrdlame 9y agoOutline is just the new readability. I'm not sure they're even aware that they're serving paywalled content. To me, the end user, the effect is the same. They're both just loopholes.
- Antrikshy 9y agoMy question is: How are they even doing it? WSJ doesn't even vend the entire article from the server if the user is not inside their paywall.
- metaphorm 9y agoI don't see how a loophole is substantively different than this approach.