Thanks for following up here, and sorry that my reply is late - too late to make any difference, probably. Yes, I was at Neil's keynote that you link the slide

Thanks for following up here, and sorry that my reply is late - too late to make any difference, probably. Yes, I was at Neil's keynote that you link the slides for. I still do not agree with your conclusions, or maybe rather with how you frame them. OpenCL is not 'being merged into Vulkan'. Rather, 'the next version(s) of OpenCL will align more ('converge') with Vulkan'. For example, you claim 'The Khronos Group are converging OpenCL and Vulkan into a single API: Vulkan.'. I do not get that from either of the Khronos 'clarifications', nor from any of the presentations given last week, nor from any of the discussions I had with people from the various Khronos workgroups, including the OpenCL-related ones. I've asked a few other people who were there how they perceived the message but haven't heard back yet. Maybe I'm just thick, wouldn't be the first time. But for now I do feel that you're spinning a more sensational story ('OpenCL will go away and be merged into Vulkan!' - on a meta-level, it's a sad reflection on my life that I consider that 'sensational'...) than what is actually going on.