The problem is that you sidestep the obvious issue as if it doesn't exist. Money represents economic activity. Healthcare and elderly care currently consumes 2

The problem is that you sidestep the obvious issue as if it doesn't exist. Money represents economic activity. Healthcare and elderly care currently consumes 20% of all economic activity. That is what's unsustainable. This is out of the question towards the future, since those people do not contribute 20% of GDP in the first place (and they'd need to contribute almost 40% to justify that). I guess the question I'm asking is simple: you want to increase this expenditure ... ok. What do you drop ? Please pick other parts of the economy that we can just drop ... Please don't just handwave "just automate it and save 50%" but ...