3 ms·

> Who said that? That is the direct implication of ignoring the woman involved. > If there's an accusation of rape the state needs to investigate that > "it

> Who said that? That is the direct implication of ignoring the woman involved. > If there's an accusation of rape the state needs to investigate that > "it was the police who made up the charges" That's one hell of an accusation. > When accused of rape most people cooperate with police. They do not skip bail and hide in a cupboard for many years. Only idiots cooperate with the police [0]. By the way, most people aren't being persecuted by the government for exposing violations of international law, so what "most people" do probably shouldn't define how we would expect Assange to act. [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8z7NC5sgik https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8z7NC5sgik

DanBC 9y ago
> Only idiots cooperate with the police That's only true for the US. He isn't being asked to talk to US police, he's being asked to talk to Swedish or British police. In both those countries the population have little to fear from the police. And it takes a special kind of idiot to run from the police, skip bail, and hide in a cupboard for years.
- benchaney 9y ago
  > That's only true for the US. He isn't being asked to talk to US police, he's being asked to talk to Swedish or British police. In both those countries the population have little to fear from the police. This isn't true at all. The specifics of American law are unique, but the general ideas apply everywhere. The idea that you shouldn't talk to the police is much older than the recent rise in police brutality in America. The 5th amendment was originally a response to overreach by the British government. > And it takes a special kind of idiot to run from the police, skip bail, and hide in a cupboard for years. Why does that make him an idiot? It is the smart play if you think you won't get treated fairly in court, which is obviously what he believes. You might think he is wrong, but that doesn't make him an idiot.
- fit2rule 9y ago
  The British police have just as much of a credibility problem as any other police force in the world. That is what happens when you participate in a cover-up of political pedophilia, as has happened with the UK's police force. There is no honor to be saved.

DanBC 9y ago

> Only idiots cooperate with the police That's only true for the US. He isn't being asked to talk to US police, he's being asked to talk to Swedish or British police. In both those countries the population have little to fear from the police. And it takes a special kind of idiot to run from the police, skip bail, and hide in a cupboard for years.

benchaney 9y ago
> That's only true for the US. He isn't being asked to talk to US police, he's being asked to talk to Swedish or British police. In both those countries the population have little to fear from the police. This isn't true at all. The specifics of American law are unique, but the general ideas apply everywhere. The idea that you shouldn't talk to the police is much older than the recent rise in police brutality in America. The 5th amendment was originally a response to overreach by the British government. > And it takes a special kind of idiot to run from the police, skip bail, and hide in a cupboard for years. Why does that make him an idiot? It is the smart play if you think you won't get treated fairly in court, which is obviously what he believes. You might think he is wrong, but that doesn't make him an idiot.
fit2rule 9y ago
The British police have just as much of a credibility problem as any other police force in the world. That is what happens when you participate in a cover-up of political pedophilia, as has happened with the UK's police force. There is no honor to be saved.