4 ms·
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_Gross_State_Product_(GSP) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_Gross_S... Add up the state
by jordache 9y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_Gross_State_Product_(GSP) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_Gross_S...
Add up the states he cited...
- encoderer 9y agoLarge parts of those states are not included in the diamond he outlined, but if you add them all up, all 5 states, it's about the same GDP as California. But, 53.5 Million people vs 39 million in CA.
- jordache 9y agofor the most part, outside of the major cities, the rest of the state is not generating much gdp
- encoderer 9y agoBut there are major cities in those states not included in his Diamond. Most notably: Philadelphia, Springfield, Peoria, Lansing, MI, Grand Rapids, Mich, etc
- santaclaus 9y agoPhilly isn't in the Midwest, hell, it's almost in the Atlantic!
- tzs 9y agoThat was his point. The article said that a region it outlines has an economy bigger than California. But adding up the GDP [1] of all the states that overlap that region gives an economy about the size of California's. Philly is in a state that overlaps the region, but is not in the region. Hence, adding up the state GDPs overestimates the GDP of the region by at least the GDP of Philly. [1] technically, I believe it is actually called the GSP (Gross State Product) in this case.