> So the Malthusian argument is incorrect, probably, if humans are like other animals > The alternative requires an assumption that humans are hugely different

> So the Malthusian argument is incorrect, probably, if humans are like other animals > The alternative requires an assumption that humans are hugely different from the species that we evolved from Well we are, for proof look at the fact that we're even discussing it here when all the other species never did. Look, that all sounds very peachy if it weren't for the fact that our species alone has grown the brains and the self-justifications for consciously attempting to continously outwit "nature" (and be able to replicate way beyond what our ancestral habitats could carry) at every turn with agriculture and all the sciences =) granted, there's no point in or way of "going back" for all manner of reasons, but we needn't lose sight of certain basic facts here..