(I work at Google but don't speak for them; I have access to internal retention data but I'm not looking at it or using it here.) I think 90% retention is (pro

(I work at Google but don't speak for them; I have access to internal retention data but I'm not looking at it or using it here.) I think 90% retention is (probably?) an underestimate. People tend to look at measurements of tenure, see a short number, and assume Google et al burn people out/have revolving doors. Instead, that's really a function of the still explosive growth we're going through (for better or worse; I say worse but who listens to me?) (Which still serves Patrick's larger point.)