>What question are you paraphrasing that somehow translates to shooting people? My question was about shooting down drones. My bad, I meant re-stating your que

>What question are you paraphrasing that somehow translates to shooting people? My question was about shooting down drones. My bad, I meant re-stating your question if drones were replaced with people. >Also when it comes to self-defense laws, most states require the shooter to genuinely believe he/she is in mortal danger before shooting. That's why I said "limited circumstances". It would be wrong to allow to shoot down drones willy-nilly, but certain circumstances should allow it. >It's not the people's decision as to whether a drone is violating the law. Well, same reasoning can be applied to take down all self-defense laws. >Shooting a drone for flying over your property could make it go out of control and injure others. In which case you should be liable for damages.