4 ms·

Woo hoo! One less thing to worry about being a "criminal" regarding. Thanks Donald. Less regulation is sometimes better.

tzs 9y ago
Are you attempting to satirize Trump supporters and their lack of attention to relevant detail? HN doesn't seem to like satire, which is why I think you are getting voted down. On the off chance it was not satire. Trump had noting to do with this. It was struck down by a court, by a judge appointed long before Trump was President, in response to a lawsuit filed long before Trump was President, using as justification a law that was signed by Obama.
- droithomme 9y ago
  My first two sentences are how I feel about this. I am genuinely excited because I do fly and develop for drones and have also been engaging in criminal activity by not registering my drones as the fascists are telling me to. The third sentence I think you can reasonably label satire. However this latest move is in fact less regulation and that is something our president has promised, so this ruling can very reasonably be seen as part of the Sentiment du Temps that he has initiated. Something I see as a good thing in part. I post thoughtful and truthful remarks and am used to being punished/downvoted for it. It just shows the ignorance, crassness and hatred of freedom of the downvoters. You mention Trump supporters. I did not vote for him. But I believe he can, will and is doing a good job. I also have observed there is a factual series of conspiracies by globalists, psychopaths and the deluded against the gentleman to destroy his efforts to improve things. He is an ass so it is understandable that the deluded have gotten sucked into the agendas of evil entities as it seems reasonable to many to hate him and ignore both what he is actually doing and the agenda of his enemies.
  - sctb 9y ago
    We need you to stop posting unsubstantive ideological comments here, like we've already asked. We ban accounts that won't.
    - droithomme 9y ago
      I was responding to a question the grandparent post requested and did so in a reasonable and factual manner. What specifically in my response do you object to? Also since you are claiming to represent ycombinator, please state your specific role and authority to speak for them as an official representative. Thank you.

tzs 9y ago

Are you attempting to satirize Trump supporters and their lack of attention to relevant detail? HN doesn't seem to like satire, which is why I think you are getting voted down. On the off chance it was not satire. Trump had noting to do with this. It was struck down by a court, by a judge appointed long before Trump was President, in response to a lawsuit filed long before Trump was President, using as justification a law that was signed by Obama.

droithomme 9y ago
My first two sentences are how I feel about this. I am genuinely excited because I do fly and develop for drones and have also been engaging in criminal activity by not registering my drones as the fascists are telling me to. The third sentence I think you can reasonably label satire. However this latest move is in fact less regulation and that is something our president has promised, so this ruling can very reasonably be seen as part of the Sentiment du Temps that he has initiated. Something I see as a good thing in part. I post thoughtful and truthful remarks and am used to being punished/downvoted for it. It just shows the ignorance, crassness and hatred of freedom of the downvoters. You mention Trump supporters. I did not vote for him. But I believe he can, will and is doing a good job. I also have observed there is a factual series of conspiracies by globalists, psychopaths and the deluded against the gentleman to destroy his efforts to improve things. He is an ass so it is understandable that the deluded have gotten sucked into the agendas of evil entities as it seems reasonable to many to hate him and ignore both what he is actually doing and the agenda of his enemies.
- sctb 9y ago
  We need you to stop posting unsubstantive ideological comments here, like we've already asked. We ban accounts that won't.
  - droithomme 9y ago
    I was responding to a question the grandparent post requested and did so in a reasonable and factual manner. What specifically in my response do you object to? Also since you are claiming to represent ycombinator, please state your specific role and authority to speak for them as an official representative. Thank you.