2 ms·
I agree. As indicated below; the way you phrased it comes off very partisan. I infer I have the opposite bias; but still agree. This law is flexible. It is for
by wand3r 9y ago
I agree. As indicated below; the way you phrased it comes off very partisan. I infer I have the opposite bias; but still agree. This law is flexible. It is for larger company's; presents the choice to the worker and seems to have reasonable adjustments for both parties.
I think protecting workers is good but top down absolutism isn't. From what I can tell based on the article this seems to be a measured response to the issue taking the middle ground