>Facebook isn't doing internet.org for "the poor". It's doing it for itself, to get them to click on ads, I highly doubt that there is much marketing dollars t

>Facebook isn't doing internet.org for "the poor". It's doing it for itself, to get them to click on ads, I highly doubt that there is much marketing dollars to be spent selling to the poorest third of the world population. The walled garden includes facebook because naturally its founder considers it an essential service. It also provides job search and informational resources. This is not a bad thing and it does not preclude these people paying for full internet if they choose to. But, while they don't have the funds and resources to do that, thank goodness Zuckerberg is making some essential websites available.