say he's 100% paid by russia. ok; fine. now let's reflect on the fact that it appears that 100% of what he's said has been true. that is a shocking fact. no

say he's 100% paid by russia. ok; fine. now let's reflect on the fact that it appears that 100% of what he's said has been true. that is a shocking fact. no less shocking because no mainstream media outlet can even come close. so what, exactly is the nature of your objection? because it looks like the epitome of an ad homenim attack, and leaves the substance of everything he's released completely unanswered (and it makes you appear too partisan to see the truth).