5 ms·
>> VCs survive by maintaining portfolios of companies in which 1-2 in 10 survive (most VCs fail to generate returns that beat the public markets). This means mo
by jonwachob91 9y ago
>> VCs survive by maintaining portfolios of companies in which 1-2 in 10 survive (most VCs fail to generate returns that beat the public markets). This means more than that you need 10 companies --- it also governs the kinds of companies you can invest in. Despite being a message board in part dedicated to startups, it feels like very few of the relatively specialized people here understand why VCs don't back quietly, steadily profitable companies.
You're assuming all VC funds are like SV/NYC type funds. Most VC funds in FL (and I'm assuming most of the US), are small funds that invest fewer than 10 times a year, and take large equity positions in companies that are steadily profitable (but will NEVER be crazy big). They prefer companies that are making profits over companies that have growth potential, low risk low reward funds.
- lenzm 9y agoYou aren't describing venture capital. By definition, venture capital is high risk and therefore must potentially have crazy big returns.
- morgante 9y agoThat sounds more like PE than VC.
- notahacker 9y agoAnd whilst PE might be ostensibly lower risk than VC, PE firms' ability to not lose money depends entirely on their ability to actively restructure companies and find a buyer, two things retail investors have no chance whatsoever to do
- morgante 9y agoOh I agree that equity crowdfunding is generally a bad idea for all involved.