3 ms·
My understanding is that he had consensual sex with them, they went to sleep, then he had nonconsensual sex with them while they were sleeping. They were indivi
by panglott 9y ago
My understanding is that he had consensual sex with them, they went to sleep, then he had nonconsensual sex with them while they were sleeping. They were individually disturbed by these events, but did not decide to file charges until they compared stories.
That's very different from "the sex became nonconsensual retroactively". And I don't think it's uncommon for women brave the consequences of speaking out about sexual assault when they believe there's a pattern of behavior they can protect other women from.
- allover 9y ago> My understanding is that he had consensual sex with them, they went to sleep, then he had nonconsensual sex with them while they were sleeping. Source? Seems to differ from: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/dec/17/julian-assange-sweden https://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/dec/17/julian-assange...
- panglott 9y agoThanks. I must have been thinking of Miss W's story there. Miss A's account is even more serious: clear sexual assault.