4 ms·
> It says nothing other than they have an investigation- well we knew that. To me, the words “he hasn't been apprehended because he is inside the Ecuadorian em
by ttctciyf 9y ago
> It says nothing other than they have an investigation- well we knew that.
To me, the words “he hasn't been apprehended because he is inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London" strongly imply, in context, that the US has an intention to "apprehend" Assange.
- abritinthebay 9y agoWell yes. We knew that already too. The US already wanted to apprehend him while he was walking around London before his Embassy period so it's clearly not a snatch & grab situation. He's not been officially charged with a crime in the US yet either so extradition isn't an issue.
- ttctciyf 9y ago> > > > > do secret charges exist? > > > > The best info we have is from Comey's testimony which says 'maybe' and they want to arrest him > > > It says nothing other than they have an investigation- well we knew that. > > and they want to arrest him > Well yes. We knew that already too. Anything else that we already know you would like to add?
- abritinthebay 9y agoNah. Given you've already devolved into misquoting and misrepresentation, I'm pretty sure we're done here.