5 ms·
Signal has a chrome app that performs as a desktop client.
by 45h34jh53k4j 9y ago
Signal has a chrome app that performs as a desktop client.
- kitsunesoba 9y agoYes, it's one of the web app bridges I was referring to. It's tethered to your phone, ugly, and feels a lot like an afterthought. Last I checked, it also doesn't work with the iOS version of Signal, so if you use an iPhone you don't get any desktop support at all. In short, it needs a lot of work before it'll be usable for anybody in a similar position to myself.
- lorenzhs 9y agoIt's not tethered to your phone. It does work with the iOS version of Signal. It's really easy to set up, too. Everything in your comment is incorrect or out of date.
- kitsunesoba 9y agoIt's good that's changed, but that wasn't the case the last time I saw any kind of news about Signal (maybe a few months ago). It would serve them well to publicize these changes.
- tptacek 9y agoThis is a classic example of what I think we should call "The Message Board Apology": "I was wrong about everything but in a way that makes me even righter."
- wjamesg 9y agoA common occurrence here on HN
- pvg 9y agoThe desktop client worked the same way (untethered, after initial setup) a few months ago as well.
- detaro 9y agoThe Signal desktop client as far as I know never was tethered to the phone (during operation, signup and getting the desktop one connected still requires a phone). you might be confusing it with Whatsapp's?
- egypturnash 9y agoCan you finally use the same Signal sign in on more than one device at once now? That was one of the things that drove me nuts about it.
- SparkyMcUnicorn 9y agoYes. I continue conversations from my phone -> computer (and vice versa) every day.
- djanatan 9y agoThis is the main reason I won't leave Telegram. I don't need perfect privacy, I've never seen any reports of Telegram actually being breached, and I use four different devices over the course of my day. Each one has a fully functioning Telegram client.
- tptacek 9y agoSignal is not great on multiple devices (it works, but not always seamlessly), but there's a reason for that: Signal is also generating virtually no serverside metadata. There's a real, practical security win for the inconvenience it's generating for people who want multi-device messaging. Compare that to Wire, which has much more convenient multi-device support, but accomplishes that at the expense of keeping the entire active graph of communicating Wire users in plaintext in their servers on AWS. Both Wire and WhatsApp (which have comparable security models with some marginal tradeoffs --- WhatsApp metadata is in Facebook's custody, which is not great, but Wire doesn't have Facebook's extremely competent and well-resourced security team) are reasonable choices for secure messengers. Telegram is not.
- qznc 9y agoThanks for pointing out the tradeoffs of Wire and Signal so forthrightly. I would not have been able to describe the difference so clearly.