3 ms·

You know who cares about these addicts, their families, who are the voting constituents of these politicians. The heroin epidemic is the worst in many tradition

You know who cares about these addicts, their families, who are the voting constituents of these politicians. The heroin epidemic is the worst in many traditionally republican states. I think you may find there is more bipartisan support for fixing the heroin problem than there is consensus around hot button topics like abortion.

kogepathic 9y ago
> You know who cares about these addicts, their families, who are the voting constituents of these politicians. You're making the assumption that their families have the resources to pay for their treatment. Nearly half of Americans are one pay cheque away from not being able to make ends meet. [0] [1] [2] Here's a poverty map of America: http://www.nytimes.com/newsgraphics/2014/01/05/poverty-map/ http://www.nytimes.com/newsgraphics/2014/01/05/poverty-map/ [0] http://www.marketwatch.com/story/half-of-americans-are-desperately-living-paycheck-to-paycheck-2017-04-04 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/half-of-americans-are-despe... [1] http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/12/pf/americans-lack-of-savings/ http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/12/pf/americans-lack-of-savings... [2] http://nypost.com/2016/09/27/why-even-half-the-middle-class-is-living-paycheck-to-paycheck/ http://nypost.com/2016/09/27/why-even-half-the-middle-class-...
- prbuckley 9y ago
  I am suggesting people will put political pressure on the government to help pay for treatment as part of the solution. As others here have suggested that if drugs were legalized the tax revenue could fund things like this.
- mmjaa 9y ago
  Some of us have families. Some of us know addicts. Between these sets, there are enough humans willing to take responsibility and help the addict. Your problem?
illumin8 9y ago
Ironically, the AHCA would significantly cut spending on drug rehabilitation programs. So, basically, the GOP are telling their constituents they are going to help them, and then passing legislation that does the opposite. It doesn't surprise me at all. They are in the pockets of big pharma and big healthcare.

kogepathic 9y ago

> You know who cares about these addicts, their families, who are the voting constituents of these politicians. You're making the assumption that their families have the resources to pay for their treatment. Nearly half of Americans are one pay cheque away from not being able to make ends meet. [0] [1] [2] Here's a poverty map of America: http://www.nytimes.com/newsgraphics/2014/01/05/poverty-map/ http://www.nytimes.com/newsgraphics/2014/01/05/poverty-map/ [0] http://www.marketwatch.com/story/half-of-americans-are-desperately-living-paycheck-to-paycheck-2017-04-04 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/half-of-americans-are-despe... [1] http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/12/pf/americans-lack-of-savings/ http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/12/pf/americans-lack-of-savings... [2] http://nypost.com/2016/09/27/why-even-half-the-middle-class-is-living-paycheck-to-paycheck/ http://nypost.com/2016/09/27/why-even-half-the-middle-class-...

prbuckley 9y ago
I am suggesting people will put political pressure on the government to help pay for treatment as part of the solution. As others here have suggested that if drugs were legalized the tax revenue could fund things like this.
mmjaa 9y ago
Some of us have families. Some of us know addicts. Between these sets, there are enough humans willing to take responsibility and help the addict. Your problem?

illumin8 9y ago

Ironically, the AHCA would significantly cut spending on drug rehabilitation programs. So, basically, the GOP are telling their constituents they are going to help them, and then passing legislation that does the opposite. It doesn't surprise me at all. They are in the pockets of big pharma and big healthcare.