5 ms·

I'm 100% we are. Step 1: People realise that Electron apps look different and do not fit the OS. Step 2: Big company invests and creates a library that suppor

I'm 100% we are. Step 1: People realise that Electron apps look different and do not fit the OS. Step 2: Big company invests and creates a library that supports Win/OSX looks. Step 3: Same big company creates a RAD type tooling for it. We present you a revolution - Big Corp. RAD Tooling 2020 a la Borland Delphi 2007.

pjmlp 9y ago
So where is Google "Blend" for ChromeOS?
realharo 9y ago
>Step 1: People realise that Electron apps look different and do not fit the OS. This is not an issue for most people. I like to use Spotify (the desktop app) as an example - it's a pretty good looking app, works nicely, and yet it uses an HTML-based UI. Microsoft's own UWP also looks vastly different than native Win32-based apps. The resource usage and slowness of Electron apps is a problem, but that is caused by using the entire browser runtime. When it comes to the capabilities of a UI framework, one of the questions I ask is "Could you build something like Spotify's UI with this? How difficult would it be?".
- noway421 9y ago
  I really wonder whether something like electrino.js solves the problem of apps being a memory hog. So far just a demo preview AFAIK, but they nailed the problem of binary size pretty well. I guess the question boils down to whether a single tab in a browser which is properly managed by OS can compete with a good old native desktop app.
noway421 9y ago
Dunno, may be you are right. With the advance of flexbox there finally would be a possibility to do good old delphi-like anchors for responsive UI. In a WYSIWYG editor. Without spitting out hardly maintable brittle javascript which simply manages layout (something which is framer.com/other designer tools can do right now). So far the facebook stack and react-desktop seems to be the best candidate for that description, but I don't neceserily think people would focus on getting it to the desktop styling. Universal Material UI (or similar?) probably would overtake that approach.

pjmlp 9y ago

So where is Google "Blend" for ChromeOS?

realharo 9y ago

>Step 1: People realise that Electron apps look different and do not fit the OS. This is not an issue for most people. I like to use Spotify (the desktop app) as an example - it's a pretty good looking app, works nicely, and yet it uses an HTML-based UI. Microsoft's own UWP also looks vastly different than native Win32-based apps. The resource usage and slowness of Electron apps is a problem, but that is caused by using the entire browser runtime. When it comes to the capabilities of a UI framework, one of the questions I ask is "Could you build something like Spotify's UI with this? How difficult would it be?".

noway421 9y ago
I really wonder whether something like electrino.js solves the problem of apps being a memory hog. So far just a demo preview AFAIK, but they nailed the problem of binary size pretty well. I guess the question boils down to whether a single tab in a browser which is properly managed by OS can compete with a good old native desktop app.

noway421 9y ago

Dunno, may be you are right. With the advance of flexbox there finally would be a possibility to do good old delphi-like anchors for responsive UI. In a WYSIWYG editor. Without spitting out hardly maintable brittle javascript which simply manages layout (something which is framer.com/other designer tools can do right now). So far the facebook stack and react-desktop seems to be the best candidate for that description, but I don't neceserily think people would focus on getting it to the desktop styling. Universal Material UI (or similar?) probably would overtake that approach.