Both this post and the one it links to are highly speculative. The headlines are link-bait and the analysis is paper-thin and overly emotionally driven. I fin

Both this post and the one it links to are highly speculative. The headlines are link-bait and the analysis is paper-thin and overly emotionally driven. I find his emotional, link-bait titled speculation that we "censor articles because they disagree with the content" a hilarious bit of meta-humor.