4 ms·
frossie, I mostly agree with you but I wanted to bring up a couple of points: * As you mentioned, the Prez' authority is (mostly) limited to the US. I say "mos
by Elrac 16y ago
frossie, I mostly agree with you but I wanted to bring up a couple of points:
* As you mentioned, the Prez' authority is (mostly) limited to the US. I say "mostly" because the US has been known to exert economic and even military pressure on other countries that didn't toe the line of US interests. Shutting down the US corner of the Internet would take about 13% of worldwide Internet _users_ offline; in terms of infrastructure and services, I'd wager it would be lots more. Consider that Google, Yahoo, MSN and lots of other globally significant sites are US based.
* Something else to consider: Who runs the DNS root servers? Isn't internic run by a US company? In theory, DNS is redundant; in practice, I think loss of the root servers would kick up a lot of disturbance. AFAIK the Internet would be crippled for most intents and purposes without DNS.
- edster 16y agoused to be that there were 12 or 13 DNS root servers. I don't know if that is still the case. I don't know if the president could shut down the internet or not, but I'd like to see him try. That would be all kinds of crazy fun.
- devicenull 16y agoDNS root servers are (mostly) handled by anycast. There's not really any one server to shut down: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_nameserver http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_nameserver
- dazzawazza 16y agoAll the major search engines have servers that can run autonomously in most major data centres around the world. Granted their caches will run stale fairly quickly but they won't be inoperable.