3 ms·
As was I — and also (because I'm not an astrophysicist so have no clue how ridiculous this sounds...) — would a much [, much, much] larger and denser/thicker ve
by detritus 9y ago
As was I — and also (because I'm not an astrophysicist so have no clue how ridiculous this sounds...) — would a much [, much, much] larger and denser/thicker version of such an array be of any use where a local supernova's concerned? eg. much further out and much, much broader, and deployed when there might be suspicion of such an impending event, from a known location?
- detritus 9y agoThrough making a stupid graphic to descibe what I meant, I answered my own question. http://www.theresomewhere.com/dump/stupidnevergoingtohappen.png http://www.theresomewhere.com/dump/stupidnevergoingtohappen.... I figured a far-off low level diversionary shield could act as a 'spike' and head off supernoval rays like some bow shock, but obviously that would be impossible to maintain a position as we orbit. Duh. So, I guess the only even vaguely plausible shield we could have is a local one — some sort of massive heavy water density spray to absorb energies before they hit our atmosphere.. in the very vain hope.