5 ms·
"Probably" being key here. I still memorize all my passwords and the average one is about 30 characters long, with my "more secure" websites going 60+.
by morinted 9y ago
"Probably" being key here. I still memorize all my passwords and the average one is about 30 characters long, with my "more secure" websites going 60+.
- alanh 9y agoOh, come on. All of them? If you're like me, that’s hundreds. Are you a memorization savant? Are you creating low-quality passwords? Mine are actually long and random (generated NOT by me and NOT four Dr Seuss words)
- morinted 9y agoIt wasn't always this way. I had horrible password standards as I'm sure most of us did when we started out on computers. - If it's a website I couldn't care about, I use a simple password, probably a remnant from growing up. - If it's a website I'm concerned about but knowingly won't use, I create a random password and clipboard it during initial creation/login, then every time I use the website I reset it (lazy man's password generator) - If it's a website that I care about, like HN, I have a loose pattern that I follow that includes symbols and numbers (that's the 30ish character I was referencing). Every website is unique. - Financial accounts have their own set of rules (unless it's stupid and has, say, an 8 character limit) - My main email accounts get special treatment with an exceptionally long password. - Use two-factor authentication wherever possible. And yes, I could replace this with: - Password manager - Two-factor authentication E: grammar.
- logfromblammo 9y agoYou just make up a story and use one of the knickknacks you keep near your workstation as a memory trigger. For instance, if I needed a new strong password, I could use, "This#jar#once#held#1111#M&Ms,#but#now#it#is#empty." The only thing I need to remember there is the story of the jar and the padding character I used in place of spaces. If I really had to, I could put "#" on a sticky note under the jar. But of course, I can't use that password now. So I might instead use "I(used(this(jar(as(an(example(on(HN." But now I can't use that one, either. So maybe I use "These!blinds!are!very!dusty.!!Someone!should!clean!them." or "My^dog^once^killed^a^dozen^baby^rabbits^in^the^tall^grass^I^didn't^want^to^mow." or "MyFgreatFauntsFhadFreallyFlongFhair." I get really irritated when sites tell me I have to include numbers, uppercase, lowercase, and symbols in the same password. I get especially irritated when they put an upper limit on the number of characters, or ban certain characters from appearing in the password.
- dkonofalski 9y agoThat's ludicrous. Is your workstation covered in sticky notes and knickknacks? Are you re-using these passwords? Do you have to buy a new knickknack for every new website you visit that requires a password?
- logfromblammo 9y agoOne photograph can contain several virtual knickknacks. I usually don't use sticky notes, as I also make a mnemonic to relate the character to the story. For instance, a story about the beach could use '@' as a conch shell, or '*' as a sea star, or '$' as a sand dollar, or '~' for ocean waves. But everyone has their own tricks for remembering things. And I certainly don't make the effort for sites that I don't consider to be important. Those as often as not just get reset via e-mail whenever I forget my password.
- scrollaway 9y agoIt's amazing the lengths people will go to to justify not using a password manager. Use a password manager. KeepassX is free, cross-platform, works on phones, does all that work for you, secures even your least-valuable accounts, does things right, doesn't store your passwords "in the cloud" and you'll get to keep applying your scheme to your master password.
- logfromblammo 9y agoExercising your memory is good for more than just passwords, you know.
- scrollaway 9y agoLike I said. Amazing.
- logfromblammo 9y ago
- SomeStupidPoint 9y agoWhy the dig at passphrases?
- memmcgee 9y agoBecause they're not actually effective. Most brute forcing is done via dictionary attacks.
- SomeStupidPoint 9y ago"Dictionary attacks" aren't a magic spell. They're a form of brute forcing, as you seem to be aware. If you're using about 8000 words, randomly chosen, then a 4 word passphrase is about the same as an 8 character random password. (And in fact, for 8k words, it's basically a direct substitution between 2 characters and 1 word.) For most intents and purposes, 8-10 characters is fine, and 20 characters is enough to use as a cryptographic key. Similarly, 4-5 words is fine for most uses, and 10 words is enough to use as a cryptographic key. So I'm not sure what you think isn't effective about passphrases -- they're just using a 2^13 sized alphabet instead of a 2^6.5 one, but either is capable of being used to write down a random string of bits.
- alanh 9y agoI don’t have a problem with passphrases per se, but when people make them up via their noggin, they aren’t random and aren’t likely to include many obscure words. Using only common words dramatically reduces entropy. E.g., there are only 1 trillion passphrases of 4 words that can be constructed with the 1000 most common words, but a 12-character passphrase pulling from alphanumerics and the ~16 punctuation characters on your keyboard yield 50 sextillion permutations. That’s 50 thousand billion billion. The argument I am making is that your average passphrase — yes, including "correct horse battery staple" — could be cracked a trillion times over before a password generated via 1Password would be!