That's why i said that the hype behind rust is unreasonable. Just look at your post. Is it an objective look at programming ? Or just a lot of words that make r

That's why i said that the hype behind rust is unreasonable. Just look at your post. Is it an objective look at programming ? Or just a lot of words that make rust look like the greatest thing ever ? If you think it is objective, what you wrote that is, then why did you not spend 10min looking at Ada ? Why did you even mention GC, the tired argument as to why "rust is better then Go (note: go has a thing that is more awsome then anything in rust, not that you would care; also go can be used without gc) ? Not that it matters anyway. There is more to programming languages then "features". There is no "perfect" programming language. Rust is most definitely not a replacement for C. And it sucks at "systems programming", whatever that is (for kernel programming, C is definitely a lot better). Just the mere fact that i will not talk about the shortcomings of rust is a clear indication that there is too much hype behind it (you can blame it on the "loud minority", but there is none). Feel free to write yet another page of text about how rust is the most greatest thing that is great and i am wrong.