3 ms·
In the "WHAT IS ALLURA?" section The first link takes you to: https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Features/ https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/
by thewhitetulip 9y ago
In the "WHAT IS ALLURA?" section
The first link takes you to: https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Features/ https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Features/
Which tells you a LOT of information like "tickets" or "git" or "activity".
now, if you are a tech person, you won't need any more information, this is already exactly same as soureforge, if you are non tech then my above comment does not apply to you.
- falsedan 9y agoThis isn't about me, it's about how the project is presenting itself. Blaming me for not getting it is missing the point: the project's presentation makes it hard for people who don't know what it is to work out if they should spend some time with it to work out if it's worth paying attention to. Saying "it's just like SourceForge" doesn't help me: the last time I earnestly used SF was with https://sourceforge.net/projects/sdlpl/files/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/sdlpl/files/, and it's changed a lot in the last 10 years, and my single question "can I do code reviews with this?" becomes two: "can I do code reviews with SF?" & "does this project attentively include every SF feature?" I looked at https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Features/#code-repository https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Features/#code... , and I don't see any ability to comment on a proposed diff. But this might be an omission! My lunchtime is nearly over…
- thewhitetulip 9y agoI am sorry if I appeared to attack you, I had no intention :) you do have valid points, the project should be proactive in advertising.