3 ms·
> Sooner or later the internet will have to be decentralized. It sounds like a pipe dream. Centralisation exists for a reason: it's far easier to coordinate co
by shubhamjain 9y ago
> Sooner or later the internet will have to be decentralized.
It sounds like a pipe dream. Centralisation exists for a reason: it's far easier to coordinate complex efforts within a single organisation, rather than a host of unreliable entities. Supposedly, we develop a protocol where we share the responsibility of crawling, indexing, and searching the whole web. Isn't is unrealistic to expect that millions of computers (an optimistic estimate considering number of Google servers dedicated to Search) would voluntarily want to participate in the effort? Who ensures redundancy, speed, and abuse handling?
If a single company commanding the whole power is untrustworthy, a million entities having no stake in the game is multifold more.
- pdimitar 9y agoI hear you. Nobody claims it's gonna be easy to go the decentralization route however. Quite the contrary, it's gonna be extremely hard, probably even harder than what it took to arrive at today's status quo. But IMO it will be worth it. Centralization and monopoly never end well. Only benevolent dictatorship systems kind of worked half-well, historically. I don't think we should just blindly believe a person in a position of power is benevolent. We humans are easily corruptible, that's the sad truth.