3 ms·
Everything that's peer reviewed and backed by statistics is science. This article is stating that the (non) statistics used by the author, a.k.a cherry picking,
by mankash666 9y ago
Everything that's peer reviewed and backed by statistics is science. This article is stating that the (non) statistics used by the author, a.k.a cherry picking, is the root of fake results.
If indeed one could replicate the results every single time, over a large population, then ESP would hold true. But that obviously fell flat on its face when the Berkeley coders backed it up with their online experiment
- RcouF1uZ4gsC 9y agoSo if Viking A measured thunder when it was cloudy vs clear, did some statistics and concluded with a sufficient P value that Thor was more likely to swing his hammer when it was cloudy, and then got a bunch of his buddies to agree his math was ok, you would call that science?
- mankash666 9y agoPeer review!= Collusion from buddies. What you describe here is collusion