>No, the capitalist actually receives all of it; the products of labour are re-appropriated at the end of production. The capitalist then pays wage, which is eq

>No, the capitalist actually receives all of it; the products of labour are re-appropriated at the end of production. The capitalist then pays wage, which is equal to the amount required to sustain the worker, i.e what is required to reproduce his labour-power commodity. This can't possibly be true. If so, what explains the legions of so called undeserving 'Rich Techies'. Some kid makes a windfall writing code on his laptop -- That's labor, right?